Monday, April 27, 2009

I OWE YOU THIS POST ON WHY TO BUY FLORIDA REAL ESTATE NOW -- AND I WILL DELIVER
















Charles Patterson, Property Management Services


Dear Readers:

Having valiantly controlled my gag reflex after swallowing, in the name of research, this saccharine PR bloggage about a Trumanesque Pleasantville , Florida blog (give me a moment here, I just threw up a little in my mouth again from the off after taste), I am now adding not just a few grains but a whole shaker's worth of iodized rock salt and a bit of freshly ground black pepper.

OK I'll admit it's true, there seem to be some indicators that it may be a better time to buy real estate now than, say, during the Black Abyss Days of mid-2008. Trying to be fair here, guys.
So let's cede a few points to the apple-cheeked Pleasantville optimist exhorting us to "buy Florida Real Estate now":

So sales are up a titch (17% supposedly), mortgage rates are down in the 5's, and it's nice to get up to $8 large off 2009 taxes for those hens teeth buyers, namely neo-credit worthy first time home buyers - but golly gee whiz I just have trouble with the Gov's pronouncement: "It does not get much better than this. You don't want to wait. Prices have gotten as low as they can. Now is the time, while the deals still exist." Trust me, the deals will continue to exist.

Realtor quotes that "savvy investors have returned to our market. But we're also seeing a lot of young families, who are buying a home to settle down and establish roots in the community. That's a sign that people aren't leaving the area, aren't leaving Florida" Segued by the Gov's: "of course they are (establishing roots) -- it's Florida. Why would they go anywhere else?" sound like self-serving pap or a tree house full of scared children singing in the dark. Actually, the Gov was saying thanks to them for keeping on in a losing business.

But the cheery homilies being bandied about are not entirely accurate. People are leaving Florida for the Carolinas and elsewhere, and savvy investors are still trying to dump their depreciated properties left and right. And is this the bottom of the market? In a Pig's Eye.

Where do I start. How about here: How can one support a stance of level or rising property values with foreclosures continuing unabated, more and more homes in REO buckets of hapless lenders, the vacant property count increasing like shrunken heads on a medicine man's loin cloth and deteriorating neighborhoods becoming unsafe and unattractive? The grim hedge fund reapers are scraping devalued properties into their distressed asset portfolios by the hundreds of millions.

Everyone's financial stress is exacerbated by credit companies' tactics of raising interest rates into the high 20% range after one late payment or an (allowed) over-the-limit purchase paired with dropping unused credit limits down to actual balances at the slightest provocation. The scrutiny of mortgage applicants could not be greater. The bail-out trillions paid to the banks disappear like water in sand --- no "trickle down" effect going on.

True, not every neighborhood is the same - and maybe this is an issue of geographic pockets; some with rising and some with dropping values. But the Florida market is not sustained by pockets like a wheel of Swiss cheese, some parts with cheese and some with just bad smelling air. The golden, creamy center of the real estate market must be whole and sweet to merit a call of stable or rising home values. Well enough of the food-related metaphors. You want to know if I recommend buying real estate.

Er -- generally, no. With some exceptions. Here they are, in a nutshell:

1) You buy 40% or more under market value. And yes, the property can have some work to be done. Nothing terminal, mind you. If the market drops some more, you have bought at tomorrow's value. With a cushion.

2) You do not need to make a chunk of change quickly from flips. You are OK with living in the home or renting it out for a couple of years. This isn't a seller's market.
Yes some people claim to be flipping and making money. I do not know of any that are doing really well with this. I do know investors that are trying to sell older inventory and flips, but it's not easy going since buyers are not easy to qualify.

3) You understand that in exchange for the quality of life home ownership grants you, you may be in a home that does not appreciate and possibly depreciates and you may pay more overall than for a rental of comparable amenities. But you will not have a landlord, you can have your pets, you can live with your partner of choice in peace, and you can get thirty year fixed rate mortgage money at the lowest rates in decades -- if you qualify under the new loan standards, that is.

4) Hail, Intrepid Investor, I bow to your valor. Cash is king and if you can fling around some of it you will find amazing deals. Yes do read number 2 above.

5) If you can buy discounted equity portfolios or form an investor team to do so, do so. I would if I could. Maybe I will. Want to participate? How does 30 cents on the dollar of property value sound?

6) Nothing wrong with lease options or (gift) wrap financing by sellers. If it drops too much all you lose is your option money. Keep it low. Meanwhile you will have a nice place to live. I would expect there are some homes one can pick up for a couple thousand in walkway funds. Do it five times with a $2,000 bill and you have five investment homes. Play the rental game right and you might just have a cash flow. Risky but doable.

I am out of steam and apparently not riding along on the "this is the bottom -- buy buy buy" band wagon. I do want to mention that I can help you select properties that will fit like the proverbial camel through the eye of this particular needle. I must further confess to picking off some properties in the $40,000 range that are renting nicely for $1,100 per month. Value in the low $100's, cash flow $400.00-plus per month. I find them almost every day. I want to buy more. So am I saying it's time to buy or not? Charlo speaks with forked tongue?
Yes I suppose, I am saying to buy -- if you do it like this.

But buy at market? You must be kidding.

More to come.....

Thursday, April 23, 2009

ANOTHER DAY IN PARADISE


Check out my new collage!


Get my collage or Create your own

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

PICTURE COLLAGE OF PATTERSON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CONDOS MANAGED BY ME, CHARLES PATTERSON


Hello Again, Valued Readers!

IF A PICTURE IS REALLY WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS, HERE ARE A THOUSAND PICTURES, WHICH SHOULD TELL YOU AS MUCH AS I COULD WRITE HERE IN A MILLION WORDS.
Yes, that is me, Charles A. Patterson, peeking out of some of the pictures as I physically drive and inspect my managed communities and speak with some owners, tenants and workmen. It's getting hot out there, guys! This is Florida you know.
I do not get to sit in an air conditioned office since I consider it importnat to drive all the properties regularly to ensure they look as good and run as smoothly as I want them to. The collage was done in Picasa, and there will be more to come, presumably saving me millions of words more in the future.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

TO BUY OR NOT TO BUY -- THAT IS THE QUESTION! WHY NOT TO BUY REAL ESTATE NOW:


Howdy, Valued Reader!
Come on in and let me inject you with another addictive dose of my street-wise real estate news!

When smart Contrarians like Brett Arends (see WSJ article/Personal Finance "
The Case For Buying a Home Right Now" begin to turn bullish on real estate it's time to pay attention. Needless to say I am the ultimate real estate Bull and love to see The Morphing of the Bears documented in the hallowed pages of the WSJ.

Having said that, now let me play Devil's Advocate to Brett Arends, the Devil's Advocate playing Devil's Advocate to himself in the above article.

Got that? Good. Assuming the opposition viewpoint has brought me much joy and knowledge in life. Walking in another's shoes and all that.... Some other shoes do at times seem a tad --- small -- I must admit. Just the other day I was walking around my office barefooted, well, because my own leather loafers were a bit tight.

First let me whip this self-professed Contrarian's softening bullish tendencies back in line with some of his own nasty facts (link to his nasty facts here).

I say: Do not buy real estate now.
Not yet, Maximus, not yet.

1) The home price-to-salary ratios are still well above 3 in many markets. Why not wait till they plummet further, maybe even to 2? In some markets no doubt they will. This would make a house worth buying at, say 2 or 2.5 times one's annual salary. And I say: take home pay. All that "gross" income they used to base mortgage payments on is just ghost money. Can't make a payment with gross income because it is not there. Net income is real money. The bank wants real money every month.

2) Admittedly, home prices have dropped like the proverbial shoe by 30 percent overall from their highest value levels in 2006. But is that it? No, I say: The other shoe has yet to drop, and it will. Take a look at the earlier home price climb from 2000 to 2003 and safely knock off another 30% of today's prices. That is today's prices, reduced by another 30%. Yep. Do the math.

3) There is ample evidence that bursting bubbles take several years to balance out, see our own country's earlier one in 1989 or Japan's. We may have a few more years of low-suds living before business as usual returns.

4) Why buy when rentals are plentiful and cheap, and good tenants are oh so desired by landlords stuck with said devalued properties they are unable to unload due to lack of equity. Just yesterday I had lunch -- read: a chilled bottle of Lipton's Diet White Tea -- with a 2006 equity millionaire three times over who wanted to divest himself of some of the real estate. First order of business was to cross off the list all the properties that had no equity or upside down equity and were not marketable. Can't sell if you have to bring cash to the closing table.

5) Another caveat for hopeful born-again property owners: The luster is worn off the wings of the glamorous real estate investment butterfly. Tenants are getting really good at ripping you off. The ex-real estate millionaire and I traded an hour's worth of war stories as to how ingenious professional ripoff tenants are finding ways to nail landlords in this sharky economy. Like the tenant that moved in with one month's rent, half a month's deposit, two mattresses, plastic storage bins and a card table and a small child in tow, telling him "You will not get another dime from me -- try to evict me if you want", and successfully squatting for a total of four months and leaving hundreds in utility bills to boot. She had a great job, nice car and dressed like a professional. Apparently a pro at ripping off landlords and ready to pack and move when absolutely necessary. After eviction court costs the net income is close to zilch. Landlording ain't what it used to be. Nothing lordly about it now.

6) How do you plan to maintain an American Pie lifestyle in your new home with three to four houses on your block vacant, boarded, regularly broken into and squatted in by assorted folks? One or two neighbors have not made their mortgage payments for the last year and freely discuss how much longer they think they have before they have to move. Your next door neighbor has just been served an eviction notice and you feel bad because you know the owner and like him, and you know the tenant and her situation too. And how do you plan to prop up your home's value which depends on other sales and the condition of the neighborhood? Where's that Pride of Home Ownership now? Up in crack pipe smoke.

Do I exaggerate? Sadly, no. I end this post affirming the worst: Homes are still priced too high, further devaluation is almost a certainty, bursting bubbles do not sudse up again within a paltry two-year time span and history tells us we are in the middle of a huge economic trough we have to trudge out of one tired step at a time. Lovely. Have I made a case for stepping back a tad and keeping your checkbook in your pocket just for now? I see you non-plussed, maybe nodding. Feel free to respond in a comment.


OK. Now prep yourself for tomorrow's blog: I will destroy my own case with a vengeance and deadly blows of logic to make you want to buy property from me by the six-pack. Make you want to write me bad checks just to tie up some homes NOW. Let me toast to this adventure with some more Lipton's White Diet tea. Cheers!

Yours Always,

"Blood-In-The-Streets"
Charlo Patterson, LCAM, CRM, M.Ed.

Monday, April 6, 2009

NEUTRON BOMB ASSET LIQUIDATION STARTEGY! SHOCKING BLOOOMBERG ARTICLE:"California Foreclosures Jeopardize Renters as Banks Seize Homes"

Hello again, Dear Reader;


Now this Bloomberg article reports an interesting tenant removal tactic practiced by the leading foreclosing banks:

Banks are breaking local rental laws in evicting hapless tenants from foreclosed homes in their feverish rush to take possession of the property. Now this is a lose/lose scenario for sure: Here we have occupants actually WILLING AND ABLE TO PAY THE RENT TO LIVE IN THE HOME, many with a long record of prompt rental payments, and the banks want them to move out instead of taking their offered rent money, leaving the homes vacant, without a cash flow and open to vandalism and vagrancy.

Why? The banks claim they are "not equipped" to "deal with" tenants. They want the empty homes but not people who want to occupy them and pay? They rather just sell the homes sixty cents on the dollar than deal with live and breathing people in the foreclosed homes. This sorry lack of basic "infrastructure" deprives the home of its highest and best use, the tenants of their legally leased and paid for domicile, and crashes the value of the real estate in a distress sale. Brilliant. I am at least glad to see that not all lenders have this fire sale mentality going on. At least Fannie an Freddie Mac do not treat their tenants as shabbily with their REO, apparently JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo are some of the ones that do.

And turning off the utilities and padlocking the home? Were a regular landlord to do this, boy would they find themselves in a court of law in a hurry, and properly fined to boot! Being a property manager and priding myself on running a clean shop just makes me shake my head at these illegal activities.

Really, what good does it do a poor tenant to even know that the law is on her side and she can stay in the home for the allotted thirty to sixty days -- depending on that state's laws -- when her house is locked, the utilities are turned off, and there is a Sheriff at the door telling her to get her stuff out NOW? Scary, heavy handed tactics, and illegal to boot. Are we back in the Robber Baron days where people are chased off by force, not law? Apparently....yes.

Harsh times do not need to be exacerbated by harsher illegal tactics. Good tenant deserve to have their rights respected, even if it takes a reasonable amount of time to deal with the toxic fall-out of a foreclosure. Beyond the basics: Would it not make sense to let the good tenants stay in possession? Give them a new lease and collect the rent? They are actually paying to live in the home, and such cash flow could positively impact the alligator aspects of a foreclosed home. Not to mention having someone in the home who is willing to take care of it and not leaving it vacant, vandalized and open for squatters.

I see the blind windows of many empty homes as I drive through my town, some broken, some boarded up. Every street has at least a couple. Some are so empty that I do not run into a soul for a whole block. Destroyed habitats of humanity. These used to be $300,000-and-above priced homes just a couple years ago. Trashed, vacant, creepy. ..... Cheap.

This methodology goes along with the lock-step mentality of a bank that kicks the owner out of the home because he cannot pay a $400,000 mortgage instead of refinancing him at actual property value. and then puts the home on the market for $150,000 for anyone else to buy.
Anyone but the owner gets the new deal. Nice.

Good property management preserves the value of the home asset, protects the owners from loss and unnecessary expense, abides by the established laws of the land that govern legal conduct of all parties involved and stabilizes a neighborhood by proper stewardship of resources. How can a bank say they are "not equipped" to deal with this? What they are apparently not equipped to do is to follow the local tenant laws or treat people decently.

This NEUTRON BOMB approach to real estate asset liquidation is the most toxic and wasteful property management style imaginable: "Save the real estate and make the people disappear" -- and we are giving these institutions HOW MANY TRILLIONS to de-populate our communities?
Why? So they can turn our neighborhoods into ghost towns?

How do you feel about that?


Here's Charlo Patterson, LCAM, CRM, M.Ed, from Florida,

Feeling the Fall-out of the Bank's Asset Liquidation Neutron Bomb Strategy